《GMAT加减法思维》连载9
来源: | 作者:passion | 发布时间: 2016-10-10 | 18454 次浏览 | 分享到:

。抓关键词:costrestoring,就知道了,这个选项在说恢复路段的不好,杀。

Bnewresidents do not need to travel,就是说没人坐铁路,如果没人坐,肯定恢复路段以后收不回成本,又在说恢复的不好,杀。

Ctherewould not be an increase in total ridership。跟B表达的意思差不多,没人坐地铁,恢复以后没钱赚,又说恢复不好,杀。

fewpeople support increased funding,没人支持投钱在交通上,就是说没人支持恢复路段,意味着恢复又一次遇到阻力,还是说不好,杀。

Eparkingfees increase,开车变贵了,不得不坐地铁,终于找到一个为恢复地铁带来利好消息的选项了,答案就是它,E



如上面这个例子所显示,如何简化原文,要看题目的规定,如果题目要求我只要找到两件事儿的因果关系(如上面那个埃及人作面包的例[0.2]),就可以按照“字面联系”作为方法,但如果题目要求我深入到原文里面的逻辑关系(如上面的例[1.6]),就必须把关注点放在论证之间的推理严谨度上面。前者后者要求的简化程度有天壤之别。



也正因为如此,我们不能只是简单的按照以往学习过的简化方法面对GMAT,这样的失败案例是显而易见的。比如:



例[1.7]

The spacing of the four holes on a fragment of a bone flute excavated at a Neanderthal campsite is just what is required to play the third through sixth notes of the diatonic scale-the seven-note musical scale used in much of Western music since the Renaissance. Musicologists therefore hypothesize that the diatonic musical scale was developed and used thousands of years before it was adopted by Western musicians.


​更多内容请您加公共微信关注: